A collaborative design project for a world without oil.

How can we utilize the collective genius of as many people as possible to work towards an ecological future in terms of housing.
This is not a rating system, this is an open source project to create criteria and a database of resources, designs, materials, how they go together and how much they cost.
There are still many questions about how this all works, so this blog was created to get feedback and develop the idea and how the process works.

An outline will be posted soon to create a foundation to work from.

Ecology

Ecology (from Greek: οἶκος, "house"; -λογία, "study of") is the scientific study of the relation of living organisms with each other and their surroundings. Ecosystems are defined by a web, community, or network of individuals that arrange into a self-organized and complex hierarchy of pattern and process.
from WikiPedia

Intro

If you would like to post an entry to this blog, send your text/images to ecologicaldesignbuild@gmail.com.

Wednesday, June 22, 2011

What is Green? by Robert Riversong

   While it's true that any specific design is appropriate only for the specific local ecology from which and for which it was crafted, the principles of ecological design are universal, just as Nature's laws are universal.
    The Sanskrit word "sunyata" (voidness) was mentioned. One of its most respected usages is in the Jewel Tree of Tibet by Nagarjuna: "sunyata karuna garbham", or "voidness with the essence of compassion". Once we let go of labels, names and categories, and discover the void or the place of silence, we experience a deep connection to all things - a connectedness which is the root of compassion. It is this empty-mind felt-connectedness which is the essence of what is truly green.
    The Quechua of Ecuador have a prophesy that one day the Eagle will fly with the Condor.  The Eagle is the technological modern civilization of the North, and the Condor is the indigenous way of the South.  One day, the Iachak (wise ones) say, the modern world will be in harmony with the ancient ways.  

Green is the symbiotic relationship between the photosynthetic bacteria called chloroplasts and the cells which transform that solar energy into blue-green algae, honeysuckle, and white pine.  
Green is the cooperative order of nature that placed the bacteria called mitochondria into harmony with each animal cell so that the chemical energy they produce becomes honeybee, swallow, catamount, and human.  
Green is that one creature’s waste is another creature’s food, that the dying feed the living, that a flowing homeostasis created by the totality of living things maintains the conditions for living things to flourish – and has done so for 3.5 billion years.  
Green, then is the delicate webwork that ties all things, animate and apparently inanimate, into a matrix of consciousness and empathy that both contains and informs all things.  
Green is the cosmic dance of creation and co-creation that is, and has always been, our destiny and our joy. Green is coherence – wholeness (haol, health).  
Green is interdependence (diametrically opposite the American suburban paradigm). 
To the degree that the design/build process is one of perceiving, acknowledging and creating coherence or wholeness, it is green.  
To the degree that it is an imposition of our own ego, it is not.  
To the degree that it is a manifestation of the mechanistic paradigm, that suggests that better technology will solve the problems created by the last new and better technology – it is not.  
It requires seeing, understanding, and a translation – through our hands – into the craft of forging an authentic vision of the living earth into a space for human habitation.  
If you work with your hands, you’re a laborer. 
If you work with your hands and mind, you’re a craftsperson.
If you work with your hands, mind and soul, you’re an artist - manifesting love (or harmony) in material form.  
   Green is the direct conversion of solar energy - of the Cosmic OM - into living things. 
   A green house is a living organism and an extension of our own being.  Our clothing is our second skin, and our home is our third skin – and both must breath (transpire moisture), be flexible and resilient, self-regulating – responding and adapting to its inner and outer environment (including temperature, humidity, pressure, insolation).  
Anthony Lawlor calls the house "the temple of our souls". Religion literally means to bind together what has been sundered.  House-building, ideally, is a religious experience, manifesting the sacred from the profane, crafting an integrative whole from a myriad of disparate parts – binding together.  
Green or ecological architecture is a process of reconnecting to the web of life: a process, not a product.  And this, I believe, is the root of the confusion over what constitutes green design and building.  
Green building has more to do with relationships between the designer, builder and home-dweller; among the crew; between material, method & mindset; than it does with a specific structural or physical outcome.  Just as healthy food must be prepared with love and reverence, a healthy (or green) house must be designed and built with a sacred appreciation of the field of consciousness that it manifests.  
Ecology is all about relationships.  To be ecological – or green – is to shift from parts to whole, from objects to relationships, from structure to pattern.  
Wholeness, relationships and pattern – modeled after what Christopher Alexander called the quaternary archetypes of nature and society, the patterns of patterns, the holographic mimicry of the created Universe.  “Every individual act of building is the process in which space gets differentiated. It is not a process of addition, in which parts are combined to create a whole, but a process of unfolding, like the evolution of an embryo, in which the whole precedes the parts, and actually gives birth to them.”  
A green house does not have to be zero net energy or zero waste, but it has to be part of a community which produces the energy it consumes and recycles all its wastes.  
To be green, a design must (literally) incorporate (embody) the social, political, economic, and ecological relationships it participates in – those interactions with other homes, with places and modalities of employment, with local governance, with schools, markets, transportation routes, forests, fields, farms, recreation & celebration.  
As long as we’re building single-family homes on privately-owned lots, we’re not building green.  As long as we build with materials or methods that are not environmentally benign, non-toxic to humans and other life forms, and fully sustainable and recyclable, we’re not building green.  
A green home unfolds from the place it is birthed, from the dreams of the home-dweller, from the creativity of the designer/builder, from the requisites of the community which enfolds it.  
Green is holographic, reciprocal, participatory, and embedded in cooperative partnership with the totality of the environment.  
 As long as we remain dis-membered from the whole of life, we will be but "troubled guests on the dark earth".  When we re-member ourselves as part of the web of life, then we will become once again green and glorious.  We literally partake of the four winds of the Earth – the four elementals. We are wind and water, earth and fire. We are cells in the body of Gaia. When we not only understand this but feel it in our bones, then we will know what is green.


3 comments:

  1. Robert,
    I think many people have a different definition of green unfortunately. The co-opt thing happened for marketing purposes obviously and now has a much watered down facade.
    I like the word "ecological" because it hasn't been co-opted and seems like it would be hard to. Although I wouldn't put it past them.
    It also describes the concept a little more.
    I am all for reclaiming good words, but this one may be a lost cause.

    As far as your concept of "green", it is inspiring yet very broad. I also have a different sense of the word "religion". I tend to use the word "spiritual" mostly because the common definition of religion is different than the one you use, which does not mention the idea of a hierarchical organization.
    This post touches on many of the concepts that I hope to draw out as this project develops.

    I look forward to more of your thoughts here.
    Ben

    ReplyDelete
  2. I would also agree with the statement that the "principles of ecological design are universal". This should be delineated somewhere in the introduction to the project.

    ReplyDelete
  3. And I would argue that "ecological" is much too narrow, and has a much too scientific ring to it.

    Every powerful word will be co-opted for marketing purposes, just as "natural" has been.

    But "green", as in the living, transforming, solar-energy-converting Gaian world is both encompassing of everything we should be striving for and evocative, lyrical and magical.

    ReplyDelete