What is Green? by Robert Riversong

   While it's true that any specific design is appropriate only for the specific local ecology from which and for which it was crafted, the principles of ecological design are universal, just as Nature's laws are universal.
    The Sanskrit word "sunyata" (voidness) was mentioned. One of its most respected usages is in the Jewel Tree of Tibet by Nagarjuna: "sunyata karuna garbham", or "voidness with the essence of compassion". Once we let go of labels, names and categories, and discover the void or the place of silence, we experience a deep connection to all things - a connectedness which is the root of compassion. It is this empty-mind felt-connectedness which is the essence of what is truly green.
    The Quechua of Ecuador have a prophesy that one day the Eagle will fly with the Condor.  The Eagle is the technological modern civilization of the North, and the Condor is the indigenous way of the South.  One day, the Iachak (wise ones) say, the modern world will be in harmony with the ancient ways.  
Green is the symbiotic relationship between the photosynthetic bacteria called chloroplasts and the cells which transform that solar energy into blue-green algae, honeysuckle, and white pine.  
Green is the cooperative order of nature that placed the bacteria called mitochondria into harmony with each animal cell so that the chemical energy they produce becomes honeybee, swallow, catamount, and human.  
Green is that one creature’s waste is another creature’s food, that the dying feed the living, that a flowing homeostasis created by the totality of living things maintains the conditions for living things to flourish – and has done so for 3.5 billion years.  
Green, then is the delicate webwork that ties all things, animate and apparently inanimate, into a matrix of consciousness and empathy that both contains and informs all things.  
Green is the cosmic dance of creation and co-creation that is, and has always been, our destiny and our joy. Green is coherence – wholeness (haol, health).  
Green is interdependence (diametrically opposite the American suburban paradigm). 
To the degree that the design/build process is one of perceiving, acknowledging and creating coherence or wholeness, it is green.  
To the degree that it is an imposition of our own ego, it is not.  
To the degree that it is a manifestation of the mechanistic paradigm, that suggests that better technology will solve the problems created by the last new and better technology – it is not.  
It requires seeing, understanding, and a translation – through our hands – into the craft of forging an authentic vision of the living earth into a space for human habitation.  
If you work with your hands, you’re a laborer. 
If you work with your hands and mind, you’re a craftsperson.
If you work with your hands, mind and soul, you’re an artist - manifesting love (or harmony) in material form.  
   Green is the direct conversion of solar energy - of the Cosmic OM - into living things. 
   A green house is a living organism and an extension of our own being.  Our clothing is our second skin, and our home is our third skin – and both must breath (transpire moisture), be flexible and resilient, self-regulating – responding and adapting to its inner and outer environment (including temperature, humidity, pressure, insolation).  
Anthony Lawlor calls the house "the temple of our souls". Religion literally means to bind together what has been sundered.  House-building, ideally, is a religious experience, manifesting the sacred from the profane, crafting an integrative whole from a myriad of disparate parts – binding together.  
Green or ecological architecture is a process of reconnecting to the web of life: a process, not a product.  And this, I believe, is the root of the confusion over what constitutes green design and building.  
Green building has more to do with relationships between the designer, builder and home-dweller; among the crew; between material, method & mindset; than it does with a specific structural or physical outcome.  Just as healthy food must be prepared with love and reverence, a healthy (or green) house must be designed and built with a sacred appreciation of the field of consciousness that it manifests.  
Ecology is all about relationships.  To be ecological – or green – is to shift from parts to whole, from objects to relationships, from structure to pattern.  
Wholeness, relationships and pattern – modeled after what Christopher Alexander called the quaternary archetypes of nature and society, the patterns of patterns, the holographic mimicry of the created Universe.  “Every individual act of building is the process in which space gets differentiated. It is not a process of addition, in which parts are combined to create a whole, but a process of unfolding, like the evolution of an embryo, in which the whole precedes the parts, and actually gives birth to them.”  
A green house does not have to be zero net energy or zero waste, but it has to be part of a community which produces the energy it consumes and recycles all its wastes.  
To be green, a design must (literally) incorporate (embody) the social, political, economic, and ecological relationships it participates in – those interactions with other homes, with places and modalities of employment, with local governance, with schools, markets, transportation routes, forests, fields, farms, recreation & celebration.  
As long as we’re building single-family homes on privately-owned lots, we’re not building green.  As long as we build with materials or methods that are not environmentally benign, non-toxic to humans and other life forms, and fully sustainable and recyclable, we’re not building green.  
A green home unfolds from the place it is birthed, from the dreams of the home-dweller, from the creativity of the designer/builder, from the requisites of the community which enfolds it.  
Green is holographic, reciprocal, participatory, and embedded in cooperative partnership with the totality of the environment.  
 As long as we remain dis-membered from the whole of life, we will be but "troubled guests on the dark earth".  When we re-member ourselves as part of the web of life, then we will become once again green and glorious.  We literally partake of the four winds of the Earth – the four elementals. We are wind and water, earth and fire. We are cells in the body of Gaia. When we not only understand this but feel it in our bones, then we will know what is green.

What new forms will be created by ecological design:economy and ecology

Lets say the business' of the future will have a bottom line in terms of ecology rather than economy because the "growth" doctrine is replaced with the "regenerative" one.  Economic success is based on ecological regeneration to achieve a steady state economy.

What will the industrial forms that arrise out of this economy and more importantly, ecology.  Will the forms found in nature in particular bioregions become the new forms in making things?

Lets look at thatch.
If we used thatch as an ecological roofing solution, how would that change the shape of the shelters we build?  For one, roofs would be steeper.  Roof slopes of at least 45º are typically used in order to preserve the thatch.  Secondly, the texture and color are largely dictated by the actual reed used.
This is a photo of a good thatching reed in Plainfield, Vt. - Phragmites.

And finally, it will be easier and take less time to achieve curved edges and surfaces.  This is not necessarily the case for all ecological materials.

What new forms will emerge depends on both the ecology and the cultural community that forms relationships with it.  Or in other words, what and how a community harvests and builds.  And to some degree, what shapes they collectively are drawn to.  But they will no longer reflect an economic standard in the sense of cheapest cost of US dollars.

Paul Gilding - The Great Disruption

From "On Point" story:

Half a lifetime ago, Australian Paul Gilding was head of Greenpeace International.

Then the lifelong environmentalist went into business.

Now, Gilding is back with a message that the environment, and business, and all our lives are tumbling into a giant change. The tornadoes, wildfire, drought and flood the world is seeing are the trumpet blast, he says.

Climate change is upon us. It’s going to profoundly change the way we live. And much sooner than we think.

He calls it the Great Disruption. He says it’s here.

One of the more important ideas here in terms of transition work is understanding what the next economy will look like and how buildings will fit into the equation.

Paul suggests instead of a "growth" economy, it will be a "steady state" economy.  This idea is not new, actually talked about by early economists of the 1700's.  This idea of a "steady state" can be synonymous with a solar economy.  A solar economy is based on the steady state of solar insolation.

The Ecological House NE will fit into this "steady state" economy.  Inherently, I believe an ecological house will be regenerative as well.  If the design reflects and works with local ecology, it will operate in a regenerative way.   

In the end Gilding says that it's not a matter of making a choice, rather it is an inevitability.  When and how this happens is somewhat of a mystery.  This is why the Ecological House project is so important.  We are on a conservative approach to planning for the next 10 years.